Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 20:01:02 GMT -8
Without Wanting to Be Actively Involved in Its Rejection, Then Feels More Comfortable in Its Attitude of Opposition Against This Labor Reform and in the Desirability of the Success of the Mobilization to Stop to the Executive, Then of the Pp. Therefore, to the Increase in Participation We Must Add Two New Factors That Explain Its Greater Social Impact. One, That, Together with the Consolidation of the Social or Critical Left, with an Active Participation in the Social Conflict, Another Broad Social Sector Is Formed That Is More Sympathetic to This Popular Rejection. Before, in 2010, It Was Constrained by the Political Interests of the Socialist Apparatus That Sought to Deactivate Citizen Indignation and Rejection Against That Regressive Labor Reform, Build a Firewall Around .
This Social Protest and Avoid Disaffection on the Left, Objectives That It Did Not Achieve. Although the Underlying Delegitimization Was Directed Against a Australia Phone Number Similar Antisocial Policy, the Difference at That Time Is That the Responsibility for Its Management Lies with the Pp, and the Psoe Considers Its Discredit Functional for Its Electoral Interests. Two, This Popular Mobilization Overcame the Strong Institutional and Media Isolation, the Attempt to Discredit the Unions and the Neutralization of the Firmness of That Critical Citizenry, Objectives That the Right (Pp-Ciu) Continued to Pursue Without Much Success; or Put Another Way, This Process of Social Mobilization Achieved Greater Recognition and Visibility in the Published Opinion of Different More Neutral Media And, at the Same Time, Had a Greater Reflection in Society. Furthermore, the Right Did Not Manage to Distort This Massive and Peaceful Citizen Mobilization, nor Turn It into a Conflict of Public Order or an Imposition of Violent Minorities, as Some Media Intended.
Summary, This General Strike Process Constituted Proof of Progressive Collective Action and the Democratic Reaffirmation of a Broad Social Left or Critical Citizenship. to the Third of That Outraged Citizenry, More Actively Involved in the Mobilization Against Social Cuts, Was Added the Sympathy and Solidarity of the Middle Third, Then More Passive and Ambivalent. the Persistence and Reinforcement of the Civic Resistance of That First Social Bloc Was Decisive in Widening the Social Opposition to This Regressive Policy and Diminishing Its Citizen Credibility. It Was a Forceful Response from an Active Citizenry and a Substantial Step to Strengthen Popular Opposition to These Antisocial Policies and Delegitimize Their Managers. Greater Citizen Understanding Was Extended Towards the Just Objectives of This Social Conflict, a Key Factor in Weakening and Reversing This Regressive Socioeconomic and Labor Policy.
This Social Protest and Avoid Disaffection on the Left, Objectives That It Did Not Achieve. Although the Underlying Delegitimization Was Directed Against a Australia Phone Number Similar Antisocial Policy, the Difference at That Time Is That the Responsibility for Its Management Lies with the Pp, and the Psoe Considers Its Discredit Functional for Its Electoral Interests. Two, This Popular Mobilization Overcame the Strong Institutional and Media Isolation, the Attempt to Discredit the Unions and the Neutralization of the Firmness of That Critical Citizenry, Objectives That the Right (Pp-Ciu) Continued to Pursue Without Much Success; or Put Another Way, This Process of Social Mobilization Achieved Greater Recognition and Visibility in the Published Opinion of Different More Neutral Media And, at the Same Time, Had a Greater Reflection in Society. Furthermore, the Right Did Not Manage to Distort This Massive and Peaceful Citizen Mobilization, nor Turn It into a Conflict of Public Order or an Imposition of Violent Minorities, as Some Media Intended.
Summary, This General Strike Process Constituted Proof of Progressive Collective Action and the Democratic Reaffirmation of a Broad Social Left or Critical Citizenship. to the Third of That Outraged Citizenry, More Actively Involved in the Mobilization Against Social Cuts, Was Added the Sympathy and Solidarity of the Middle Third, Then More Passive and Ambivalent. the Persistence and Reinforcement of the Civic Resistance of That First Social Bloc Was Decisive in Widening the Social Opposition to This Regressive Policy and Diminishing Its Citizen Credibility. It Was a Forceful Response from an Active Citizenry and a Substantial Step to Strengthen Popular Opposition to These Antisocial Policies and Delegitimize Their Managers. Greater Citizen Understanding Was Extended Towards the Just Objectives of This Social Conflict, a Key Factor in Weakening and Reversing This Regressive Socioeconomic and Labor Policy.